Repository navigation
docs: separate global and Agent OS guidance - #226
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
Security findingsAdvisory findings (1)
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 6925929ab1
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4559ac4e74
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ad6550dd5b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Scope clarification for the final head Accordingly, the extra public documents introduced during earlier review iterations are removed/restored to their original main content; those earlier thread replies describe superseded intermediate fixes. The final PR-base diff changes only AGENTS.md, retaining Agent OS-specific rules. The remaining missing-public-duplicate findings are intentional migration decisions, not missing instructions in the combined workflow. The new-document index finding is obsolete because no new document remains. Independent review verified the combined global/project coverage under this clarified scope. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 43146d9552
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex security review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛡️ Codex Security Review
Here are some automated security review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 9c266a4c4c
ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub
This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
- You comment "@codex security review"
- A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.
Consolidate reusable working preferences in the user's global AGENTS.md and keep the project file focused on Agent OS architecture, ledger-selection and recovery rules, provider coverage, documentation layout, security backlog and certification decisions.
The maintainer explicitly confirmed that this workflow assumes the global guidance is available; supporting agents without it is outside this change's scope. Generic engineering evidence, final-head reviews, live-operation authorization, self-contained documentation, skills/model preferences, review automation and threat-model maintenance remain in the global guidance. The global file stays local and is not published in this PR. No duplicate public workflow documents are added. Existing repository change-control requirements remain unchanged.
Validation: independent review of the full migration; staged diff integrity; staged AIMS document verification; 78 document verification and assessment-bundle tests passed. The repository's staged-content materializer avoids Windows checkout line-ending conversion in the unchanged manifest. Existing documentation CI remains applicable; no runtime or race tests were added.
Update the CI documentation to remove its obsolete reference to project AGENTS.md review sequencing; the existing threat-model and workflow security-review requirements remain intact.