Repository navigation
docs(research): record why codemode gets no agent() function - #195
Open
geminixiang wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
geminixiang wants to merge 1 commit into
geminixiang wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Records an experiment that adds a script-only
agent()to codemode and compares it with direct work on many-document tasks. The model never called it unprompted (0 of 21 runs, guidance included); it helped only when the user asked for fan-out, at 3–4× cost. Not adopted. Also records that nerdctl caps public-office mounts at about 25 channels.Lab data only. Docs only: no Slack E2E needed.