8000 fix: changing the bootstrapping suggestion to the command by shawkins · Pull Request #35616 · keycloak/keycloak · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

fix: changing the bootstrapping suggestion to the command - #35616

Merged
vmuzikar merged 1 commit into
keycloak:mainfrom
shawkins:iss35526
Dec 5, 2024
Merged

vmuzikar merged 1 commit into
keycloak:mainfrom
shawkins:iss35526

Conversation

@shawkins
@shawkins shawkins commented Dec 4, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

closes: #35526

cc @jonkoops @vmuzikar the admin message from the welcome resource doesn't seem to be used by us, but I'm not sure if it could be used by something custom and therefore needs to stay for now.

closes: keycloak#35526

Signed-off-by: Steve Hawkins <shawkins@redhat.com>
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ private Theme getTheme() {
}

protected String getAdminCreationMessage() {
@jonkoops jonkoops Dec 4, 2024 •
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this actually get used anywhere? Perhaps we can get rid of this code. Or let's at least log an issue to clean this up in v27.

@vmuzikar vmuzikar Dec 5, 2024 •
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The adminUserCreationMessage property doesn't seem to be used, you're right. I don't think we need to wait to 27 before removing it. But we can do it as a follow-up.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, we can't remove as custom themes might be using it. So we need to wait to 27...

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should I capture this as a follow up issue then?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, then let's log a task to remove it in the next major

@jonkoops jonkoops left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shawkins
shawkins marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2024 12:38
@shawkins
shawkins requested review from a team as code owners December 5, 2024 12:38
@vmuzikar
vmuzikar merged commit 4c7dea5 into keycloak:main Dec 5, 2024
shawkins added a commit to shawkins/keycloak that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2024
…5616)

closes: keycloak#35526

Signed-off-by: Steve Hawkins <shawkins@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4c7dea5)
shawkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
…35666)

closes: #35526

Signed-off-by: Steve Hawkins <shawkins@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4c7dea5)
@edewit edewit mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2024
edewit pushed a commit to edewit/keycloak that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
…5616) (keycloak#35666)

closes: keycloak#35526

Signed-off-by: Steve Hawkins <shawkins@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4c7dea5)
Signed-off-by: Erik Jan de Wit <erikjan.dewit@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Initial keycloak bootstrap suggestion is not correct.

3 participants

0