Repository navigation
Conversation
69c987d to
c67aca9
Compare
Unreported flaky test detectedIf the flaky tests below are affected by the changes, please review and update the changes accordingly. Otherwise, a maintainer should report the flaky tests prior to merging the PR. org.keycloak.testsuite.federation.ldap.LDAPGroupMapperTest#test01_ldapOnlyGroupMappings |
afda453 to
17da8e8
Compare
|
@tdiesler Would it be possible to update the PR description so it more accurately reflects the changes in this PR? Also, I wanted to get your thoughts on whether it would be better to handle the tx_code policy support (headless mode vs. UI-only mode) within this PR, or if it would make more sense to include it in the policy PR instead? |
Unreported flaky test detectedIf the flaky tests below are affected by the changes, please review and update the changes accordingly. Otherwise, a maintainer should report the flaky tests prior to merging the PR. org.keycloak.testsuite.broker.KcOidcBrokerTest#loginWithExistingUserWithBruteForceEnabledKeycloak CI - Java Distribution IT (windows-latest - temurin - 17) |
fd1e815 to
b9ce9f5
Compare
70e2842 to
63e3d60
Compare
b64ba8d to
7c6ab1c
Compare
Signed-off-by: Thomas Diesler <tdiesler@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Diesler <tdiesler@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Diesler <tdiesler@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Diesler <tdiesler@proton.me>
closes #47652
depends on
To reduce friction, we removed
tx_codein favor support forauthorization_code grant. Now that we have the latter, it'd be useful to restoretx_codefor pre-authorized_code grants