Repository navigation
Fix OpenAPI spec key reordering on incremental builds #48371
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Pepo48 does this mean we need to update our usage of these annotations
@Extension(name = KeycloakOpenAPI.Profiles.ADMIN, value = "")- for whatever reason the value is null in all of them, and it looks now that will simply get omitted.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@shawkins tl;dr I don't think that annotations need any updating at this point.
My understanding of the change in smallrye-open-api/pull/2490 is prior to the PR, the tag copy leaked into the output as (most likely harmless) x-smallrye-profile-admin: "" and in 4.3.1 the new
ExtensionRemovalFilterstrips it.The question rather is, do we even need these annotations? For v2 we have no
scanProfiles, so they never had any effect, right? I already tried earlier today to just remove@Extension(name = KeycloakOpenAPI.Profiles.ADMIN, value = "")fromClientsApi.javaand nothing happened after the rebuild, the spec was identical. But I didn't want to touch this part unnecessarily as I am not that familiar in this area, so I may be missing something that is evident (my only goal was to get rid of the annoying spec drifts 😊).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My answer to both is I don't know, so I wanted to check before something was removed.
With #25259 it seems like they were used to just trigger the openapi inclusion, not that anyone was looking for the custom value.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd keep as is. We can discuss and eventually remove the annotation as a follow-up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The intent is that
x-smallrye-profile-*extensions generally shouldn't be in the output so it's a little surprising they were there previously. Are you only generating this file using the OpenAPI Maven plugin?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@MikeEdgar yes, it's fully generated from annotations (without manual edits) via SmallRye OpenAPI plugin.