8000 Isolated Processes 16: Lay out default remote IO and wire format by marti4d · Pull Request #216 · rust-minidump/minidump-writer · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Isolated Processes 16: Lay out default remote IO and wire format - #216

Merged
marti4d merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
isolated_process/16-remote-io-and-wire-format
Sep 1, 2026
Merged

marti4d merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
isolated_process/16-remote-io-and-wire-format

Conversation

@marti4d
@marti4d marti4d commented Aug 24, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This defines the first IO implementation (AF_UNIX + SOCK_STREAM), the serialization structures, and the first serializer (Postcard) for the remote executor.

Note that these are just defaults, as traits are used to allow for more IO implements (for example, AF_UNIX + SOCK_SEQPACKET) and more serializers (for example, serde_json).

Base automatically changed from isolated_process/15-serializable-types to main August 25, 2026 14:10
@marti4d
marti4d force-pushed the isolated_process/16-remote-io-and-wire-format branch 2 times, most recently from bea4a95 to 34fe884 Compare August 27, 2026 19:53
@gabrielesvelto gabrielesvelto left a comment
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM and the conflicts are trivial, merge at will

This defines the first IO implementation (AF_UNIX + SOCK_STREAM), the
serialization structures, and the first serializer (Postcard) for the
remote executor.

Note that these are just defaults, as traits are used to allow for more IO
implements (for example, AF_UNIX + SOCK_SEQPACKET) and more serializers
(for example, serde_json).
@marti4d
marti4d force-pushed the isolated_process/16-remote-io-and-wire-format branch from 34fe884 to b362d07 Compare September 1, 2026 20:12
@marti4d
marti4d merged commit 4a345a8 into main Sep 1, 2026
16 checks passed
@marti4d
marti4d deleted the isolated_process/16-remote-io-and-wire-format branch September 1, 2026 20:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

0