Repository navigation
Update with core authn team #47780
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update with core authn team #47780
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -33,6 +33,16 @@ team/core-iam: | |
| - area/user-profile | ||
| - area/workflows | ||
|
|
||
| team/core-authn: | ||
| - area/account/ui | ||
| - area/admin/ui | ||
| - area/authentication | ||
| - area/core | ||
| - area/identity-brokering | ||
| - area/saml | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Does it mean, the SAML is shared for the
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. SAML is strictly speaking a protocol, but, as I usually managed the issues related to SAML, don't know who is going to be the responsible. @mposolda WDYT? Do we share SAML for the moment? |
||
| - area/test-framework | ||
| - area/token-exchange/subject-impersonation | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Is it intentional to have the
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I would assign TE as a whole to one or both teams. Assigning just a minor part makes no sense. If we should start doing the delegation part we can share the |
||
|
|
||
| team/core-shared: | ||
| - area/account/api | ||
| - area/admin/api | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This one is right now for core-iam. I suppose that only the authentication stuff related to identity brokering is for us, not the identity provider implementation. In such case, I would say that this one should remain in core-iam, only the stuff that is related to authentication via identity providers is for us. They can assign to us issues that are more
area/authenticationthanarea/identity-brokering.